----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2372/#review5320 -----------------------------------------------------------
.clang-format <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2372/#comment4834> we usually do not use this style .clang-format <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2372/#comment4835> we usually do not use this style .clang-format <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2372/#comment4836> 78 or 76 I would say Somehow we need to be able to tell clang to put the return type on a separate line for methods. This is one major difference with how things are done at the moment. The way we format our stats is also a bit of an odd one with the name .init .desc etc. the formatter really does not like this, and I'm not sure what to do about it. - Andreas Hansson On Sept. 1, 2014, 6:05 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2372/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 1, 2014, 6:05 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 10318:a79d63495fed > --------------------------- > style: add .clang-format file > > The format specified in this file is used by clang-format to fix > the formatting of a given file. > > > Diffs > ----- > > .clang-format PRE-CREATION > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2372/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Nilay Vaish > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
