A bug was recently found in the bimodal predictor.  If you are still
looking at this, you might want to try a new checkout.  Hope this helps.


On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Zi Yan via gem5-dev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I get 5 100-million-instruction simpoints for each benchmark in
> SPEC CPU 2006 with *ref input*. I am using cross-tool
> arm-cortex_a15-linux-gnueabi-gcc version 4.8.2 to compile.
>
> For gcc, I got from 0.2% to 5% miss rate from tournament, but 3% to 22%
> miss rate from bi-mode cross all simpoints.
>
> Most weird part is hmmer, I got from 0.3% to 0.5% miss rate from
> tournament,
> but 52% to 60% miss rate from bi-mode.
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Yan Zi
>
> On 2 Jul 2014, at 17:11, Anthony Gutierrez via gem5-dev wrote:
>
> > This could depend on a lot of factors. How are you running the
> benchmarks?
> >
> > E.g., running SPEC 2k6's gcc to completion with the train input set in FS
> > mode yields a 6.45% miss rate for bi-mode, while the tournament predictor
> > yields a 7.12% miss rate.
> >
> >
> > Anthony Gutierrez
> > http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~atgutier
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Zi Yan via gem5-dev <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I just updated gem5-dev and got bi-mode as ARM's default
> >> branch predictor.
> >>
> >> I got mis-prediction rate
> >>
> (system.cpu.branchPred.condIncorrect/system.cpu.branchPred.condPredicted)
> >> ranging from 10% to 60%, whereas I saw mis-prediction rate ranging
> >> from 1% to 9% with tournament for SPEC CPU 2006 benchmarks.
> >>
> >> Should I expect this from bi-mode?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards
> >> Yan Zi
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gem5-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > gem5-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to