On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Beckmann, Brad wrote:
Hi Nilay,
Could you explain the motivation behind this change? What was wrong
with the previous notation that data member declarations are separated
by commas rather than semi-colons?
I think in most places in SLICC we use comma to separate the attributes of
a variable. So, having a different meaning for comma when used while
declaring parameters does not seem right to me. Second, message buffers
typically have several attributes with them. If we were to retain the
comma as separator, then it would not be possible to specify message
buffers as parameters.
--
Nilay
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
