Would do it sometime this week. I also need to take a look if there are
requests from other users.
--
Nilay
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Andreas Hansson via gem5-dev wrote:
On Dec. 5, 2014, 5:45 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Ship It!
mike upton wrote:
Is there something blocking this change?
Nilay, would you by any chance be able to push this?
- Andreas
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2548/#review5646
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Dec. 5, 2014, 1:14 a.m., mike upton wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2548/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Dec. 5, 2014, 1:14 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
-------
arm: Add unlinkat syscall implementation
added ARM aarch64 unlinkat syscall support, modeled on other <xxx>at syscalls.
This gets all of the cpu2006 int workloads passing in SE mode on aarch64.
hmmer, omnetpp
Diffs
-----
src/arch/arm/linux/process.cc ad9146bb5598
src/sim/syscall_emul.hh ad9146bb5598
src/sim/syscall_emul.cc ad9146bb5598
Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2548/diff/
Testing
-------
build/ARM/tests/opt/quick/se
SPEC CPU2006 integer apps, test and train input sizes
Thanks,
mike upton
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
