On Wed, 13 May 2015, Brad Beckmann wrote:
On May 11, 2015, 11:48 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
Please the read the discussion we had for this patch before:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1620/. I still think this is a bad idea.
I don't quite understand your resistence. This patch only provides more
flexibility in naming. It won't allow two variables with the same id.
The flexibility is not required. We all have written lots of code in
several different languages where this flexibility does not exist. I am
against adding things to a language that are not required. I will say the
same thing that I said in a different mail: if my code is broken, I would
not try to fix the compiler.
--
Nilay
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
