> On May 13, 2015, 9:33 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc, line 423
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2776/diff/1/?file=45140#file45140line423>
> >
> >     In the crossbar we only send a single retry at a time. It used to look 
> > like this, but imho it makes no sense. Once one port goes ahead the 
> > RubyPort will be busy, will it not?
> 
> Brad Beckmann wrote:
>     Actually, when we attach a GPU to the RubyPort we create on port per 
> work-item (lane of execution).  Thus it is very common to retry many ports in 
> a single cycle.
> 
> Andreas Hansson wrote:
>     May ports with different destinations make sense, I think my confusion 
> here is because the RubyPort is also an implicit crossbar. Actually, should 
> we not make the RubyPort 1:1 and rely on the interconnect Ruby or a CrossBar 
> to do the multiplexing. To me it seems this would solve a lot of the issues.
> 
> Brad Beckmann wrote:
>     We have a lot of code that relies on the RubyPort and its associated 
> children objects to coalesce requests.  The RubyPort is a natural place to 
> coalesce because the port-RubyPort interface is a per request/address 
> packet-based interface and Ruby's memory is cache-blocked based.

Ok. I still assume you do coalescing per port, not across ports?

In any case, we can save this one for later. I just find it unfortunate that we 
effectively end up maintaining two crossbar models, and that one is embedded in 
the RubyPort.


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2776/#review6249
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 11, 2015, 10:28 p.m., Tony Gutierrez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2776/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 11, 2015, 10:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10833:e624796bae17
> ---------------------------
> ruby: cleaner ruby tester support
> 
> This patch allows the ruby random tester to use ruby ports that may only
> support instr or data requests.  This patch is similar to a previous changeset
> (8932:1b2c17565ac8) that was unfortunately broken by subsequent changesets.
> This current patch implements the support in a more straight-forward way.
> The patch also includes better DPRINTFs and generalizes the retry behavior
> needed by the ruby tester so that other testers/cpu models can use it as well.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/example/ruby_random_test.py 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MESI_Three_Level.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MESI_Two_Level.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MI_example.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MOESI_CMP_directory.py 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MOESI_CMP_token.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MOESI_hammer.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/Check.cc fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/CheckTable.cc 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/RubyTester.hh 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/RubyTester.cc 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/RubyTester.py 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/mem/packet_queue.cc fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.hh fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2776/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tony Gutierrez
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to