> On May 12, 2015, 1:52 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > It seems we can have a table that maps an operator to the expected type.
> > The code for checking and raising error need not be duplicated.

The patch has been updated to use a map.


- Tony


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2791/#review6197
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 20, 2015, 10:43 a.m., Tony Gutierrez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2791/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 20, 2015, 10:43 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10891:5d9dcfdd26b9
> ---------------------------
> slicc: improve support for prefix operations
> 
> This patch fixes the type handling when prefix operations are used.  
> Previously
> prefix operators would assume a void return type, which made it impossible to
> combine prefix operations with other expressions.  This patch allows SLICC
> programmers to use prefix operations more naturally.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/OperatorExprAST.py 
> ebb3d0737aa72ec4fa24b6af9cf9a6b2a1109d18 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2791/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tony Gutierrez
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to