-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3342/#review8052
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Seems a good cleanup to me!

- Alexandru Dutu


On Feb. 23, 2016, 8:58 p.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3342/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 23, 2016, 8:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> mem: Remove threadId from memory request class
> 
> In general, the ThreadID parameter is unnecessary in the memory system
> as the ContextID is what is used for the purposes of locks/wakeups.
> Since we allocate sequential ContextIDs for each thread on MT-enabled
> CPUs, ThreadID is unnecessary as the CPUs can identify the requesting
> thread through sideband info (SenderState / LSQ entries) or ContextID
> offset from the base ContextID for a cpu.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ext/sst/ExtMaster.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/arch/arm/isa.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/arch/arm/vtophys.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/base.hh ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/checker/cpu.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/checker/cpu_impl.hh ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/kvm/base.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/kvm/x86_cpu.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/minor/fetch1.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/minor/lsq.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/o3/fetch_impl.hh ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/o3/lsq.hh ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/o3/lsq_impl.hh ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/simple/atomic.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/simple/timing.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.cc 
> ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/Check.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/cpu/trace/trace_cpu.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/mem/cache/prefetch/queued.cc ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
>   src/mem/request.hh ef6e57ac0d708aff0af51c77ff0aee2c069993cf 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3342/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Curtis Dunham
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to