> On March 14, 2016, 12:48 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > util/tlm/sc_port.cc, line 187
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3313/diff/2/?file=54076#file54076line187>
> >
> >     The transactor should also not see any clean evicts.
> 
> Abdul Mutaal Ahmad wrote:
>     so I need to drop this line as well
> 
> Andreas Hansson wrote:
>     I'd suggest to copy&paste the panics from bridge.cc
> 
> Abdul Mutaal Ahmad wrote:
>     That is the only panic in bridge.cc

My bad. dram_ctrl.cc has an additional check that I think would make sense here 
as well.


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3313/#review8081
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 14, 2016, 4:25 p.m., Abdul Mutaal Ahmad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3313/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 14, 2016, 4:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> memInhibitAsserted() has been removed from packet.hh. This change has been 
> reflected in TLM based SystemC memory
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   util/tlm/sc_port.cc UNKNOWN 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3313/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Abdul Mutaal Ahmad
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to