Thanks for bringing this up. It's been a long time since we've discussed
gem5-stable on the mailing list.

I propose that we come up with a few options on what we, as a community,
want to do with gem5-stable, vote on them, and then stick to our decision.
Below is what I see are the options. If anyone else has other ideas, please
chime in!

1. Get rid of gem5-stable.
2. Continue with the previous approach of tagging gem5 every quarter and
releasing a gem5-stable branch.
3. Develop a process of milestones and release after each milestone is
complete. Between milestone releases, we can backport bugfixes into
gem5-stable.

My opinions:
1. gem5-stable is no more bug-free than gem5-dev. It's only "stable" in the
sense that we never commit to it. *I think this is what we should do for
now.*
2. I don't think that the previous gem5-stable approach of tagging gem5
quarterly provides any added benefit. Users can just as easily clone
gem5-dev and just not update if they want a "stable" platform. That's all
gem5-stable was anyway.
3. I think having milestones and true "releases" would be the best thing we
can do. However, I don't think we are currently at a place where we can
implement this. If I'm wrong, and someone in the community wants to step up
and take this responsibility, I think it would really benefit our users.

What do other's think?

Cheers,
Jason



On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:24 AM Pierre-Yves Péneau <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Since September 2015, gem5 has no stable version. However, a high
> activity has been observed this year, and a lot of major features have
> been added (big.LITTLE support, power modeling, new GPUs, ElasticTraces
> etc..). I am wondering if there is any plan to release a new stable
> version in the next weeks/months ?
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Pierre-Yves Péneau - PhD student |  first.last at lirmm.fr  |
> | LIRMM / CNRS - SYSMIC team       |    + 33 4 67 41 86 33    |
> | Building 4 Office H2.2           |    http://walafc0.org    |
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to