Hi all, Could someone actually do this? I don't have permission (or know how) to manage the repositories.
Alternatively, someone could give me access, and I can figure it out and take care of it ;). Thanks, Jason On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:34 AM Pierre-Yves Péneau < [email protected]> wrote: > I am glad to see that my email leads to quick response and action :-) > > Thank you all. > > > > On 10/07/2016 04:04 PM, Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > > Thanks for getting back to me everyone. I'm going to send out a message > to > > > gem5-users to make sure there are no other objections. If there's nothing > > > in about a week, we should shut down gem5-stable. > > > > > > Who knows how to do this / has the access to do it? I don't. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jason > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:59 AM Andreas Sandberg < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 for #1 from me as well. > > >> > > >> Ideally, I’d like to see #3, but I don’t think we can make that work at > > >> the moment. > > >> > > >> //Andreas > > >> > > >> On 03/10/2016, 01:06, "gem5-dev on behalf of Steve Reinhardt" < > > >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf > of > > >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> > > >> I agree with #1. The existence of gem5-stable is just confusing, since > we > > >> don't have a good process to keep it up-to-date. > > >> > > >> Steve > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:56 AM Beckmann, Brad <[email protected] > > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> I strongly support 1 as well. > > >> > > >> Brad > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: gem5-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas > > >> Hansson > > >> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 7:03 AM > > >> To: gem5 Developer List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > >> Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Stable release > > >> > > >> Hi Jason, > > >> > > >> I support 1 for now (based on example the argument you mention). Once we > > >> have moved to git we can reconsider. > > >> > > >> Andreas > > >> > > >> On 30/09/2016, 15:00, "gem5-dev on behalf of Jason Lowe-Power" > > >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf > of > > >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Thanks for bringing this up. It's been a long time since we've > > >>> discussed gem5-stable on the mailing list. > > >>> > > >>> I propose that we come up with a few options on what we, as a > > >>> community, want to do with gem5-stable, vote on them, and then stick to > > >> our decision. > > >>> Below is what I see are the options. If anyone else has other ideas, > > >>> please chime in! > > >>> > > >>> 1. Get rid of gem5-stable. > > >>> 2. Continue with the previous approach of tagging gem5 every quarter > > >>> and releasing a gem5-stable branch. > > >>> 3. Develop a process of milestones and release after each milestone is > > >>> complete. Between milestone releases, we can backport bugfixes into > > >>> gem5-stable. > > >>> > > >>> My opinions: > > >>> 1. gem5-stable is no more bug-free than gem5-dev. It's only "stable" in > > >>> the sense that we never commit to it. *I think this is what we should > > >>> do for > > >>> now.* > > >>> 2. I don't think that the previous gem5-stable approach of tagging gem5 > > >>> quarterly provides any added benefit. Users can just as easily clone > > >>> gem5-dev and just not update if they want a "stable" platform. That's > > >>> all gem5-stable was anyway. > > >>> 3. I think having milestones and true "releases" would be the best > > >>> thing we can do. However, I don't think we are currently at a place > > >>> where we can implement this. If I'm wrong, and someone in the community > > >>> wants to step up and take this responsibility, I think it would really > > >>> benefit our users. > > >>> > > >>> What do other's think? > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Jason > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:24 AM Pierre-Yves Péneau < > > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi all, > > >>>> > > >>>> Since September 2015, gem5 has no stable version. However, a high > > >>>> activity has been observed this year, and a lot of major features > > >>>> have been added (big.LITTLE support, power modeling, new GPUs, > > >>>> ElasticTraces etc..). I am wondering if there is any plan to release > > >>>> a new stable version in the next weeks/months ? > > >>>> > > >>>> Thank you. > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> +-------------------------------------------------------------+ > > >>>> | Pierre-Yves Péneau - PhD student | first.last at lirmm.fr | > > >>>> | LIRMM / CNRS - SYSMIC team | + 33 4 67 41 86 33 > <+33%204%2067%2041%2086%2033> > > >> <+33%204%2067%2041%2086%2033> | > > >>>> | Building 4 Office H2.2 | http://walafc0.org | > > >>>> +-------------------------------------------------------------+ > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>> gem5-dev mailing list > > >>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > >>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > >>>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> gem5-dev mailing list > > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > >>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > >> > > >> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > > >> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > > >> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > > >> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy > the > > >> information in any medium. Thank you. > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> gem5-dev mailing list > > >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> gem5-dev mailing list > > >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> gem5-dev mailing list > > >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > >> > > >> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > > >> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > > >> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > > >> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy > the > > >> information in any medium. Thank you. > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> gem5-dev mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > gem5-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > > > > > > -- > > +-------------------------------------------------------------+ > > | Pierre-Yves Péneau - PhD student | first.last at lirmm.fr | > > | LIRMM / CNRS - SYSMIC team | + 33 4 67 41 86 33 > <+33%204%2067%2041%2086%2033> | > > | Building 4 Office H2.2 | http://walafc0.org | > > +-------------------------------------------------------------+ > > _______________________________________________ > > gem5-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
