Hi all,

Could someone actually do this? I don't have permission (or know how) to
manage the repositories.

Alternatively, someone could give me access, and I can figure it out and
take care of it ;).

Thanks,
Jason

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:34 AM Pierre-Yves Péneau <
pierre-yves.pen...@lirmm.fr> wrote:

> I am glad to see that my email leads to quick response and action :-)
>
> Thank you all.
>
>
>
> On 10/07/2016 04:04 PM, Jason Lowe-Power wrote:
>
> > Thanks for getting back to me everyone. I'm going to send out a message
> to
>
> > gem5-users to make sure there are no other objections. If there's nothing
>
> > in about a week, we should shut down gem5-stable.
>
> >
>
> > Who knows how to do this / has the access to do it? I don't.
>
> >
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Jason
>
> >
>
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:59 AM Andreas Sandberg <
> andreas.sandb...@arm.com>
>
> > wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> +1 for #1 from me as well.
>
> >>
>
> >> Ideally, I’d like to see #3, but I don’t think we can make that work at
>
> >> the moment.
>
> >>
>
> >> //Andreas
>
> >>
>
> >> On 03/10/2016, 01:06, "gem5-dev on behalf of Steve Reinhardt" <
>
> >> gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org> on behalf
> of
>
> >> ste...@gmail.com<mailto:ste...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> I agree with #1. The existence of gem5-stable is just confusing, since
> we
>
> >> don't have a good process to keep it up-to-date.
>
> >>
>
> >> Steve
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:56 AM Beckmann, Brad <brad.beckm...@amd.com
>
> >> <mailto:brad.beckm...@amd.com>>
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> I strongly support 1 as well.
>
> >>
>
> >> Brad
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
>
> >> From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Andreas
>
> >> Hansson
>
> >> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 7:03 AM
>
> >> To: gem5 Developer List <gem5-dev@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-dev@gem5.org>>
>
> >> Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Stable release
>
> >>
>
> >> Hi Jason,
>
> >>
>
> >> I support 1 for now (based on example the argument you mention). Once we
>
> >> have moved to git we can reconsider.
>
> >>
>
> >> Andreas
>
> >>
>
> >> On 30/09/2016, 15:00, "gem5-dev on behalf of Jason Lowe-Power"
>
> >> <gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org> on behalf
> of
>
> >> ja...@lowepower.com<mailto:ja...@lowepower.com>> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>> Thanks for bringing this up. It's been a long time since we've
>
> >>> discussed gem5-stable on the mailing list.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> I propose that we come up with a few options on what we, as a
>
> >>> community, want to do with gem5-stable, vote on them, and then stick to
>
> >> our decision.
>
> >>> Below is what I see are the options. If anyone else has other ideas,
>
> >>> please chime in!
>
> >>>
>
> >>> 1. Get rid of gem5-stable.
>
> >>> 2. Continue with the previous approach of tagging gem5 every quarter
>
> >>> and releasing a gem5-stable branch.
>
> >>> 3. Develop a process of milestones and release after each milestone is
>
> >>> complete. Between milestone releases, we can backport bugfixes into
>
> >>> gem5-stable.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> My opinions:
>
> >>> 1. gem5-stable is no more bug-free than gem5-dev. It's only "stable" in
>
> >>> the sense that we never commit to it. *I think this is what we should
>
> >>> do for
>
> >>> now.*
>
> >>> 2. I don't think that the previous gem5-stable approach of tagging gem5
>
> >>> quarterly provides any added benefit. Users can just as easily clone
>
> >>> gem5-dev and just not update if they want a "stable" platform. That's
>
> >>> all gem5-stable was anyway.
>
> >>> 3. I think having milestones and true "releases" would be the best
>
> >>> thing we can do. However, I don't think we are currently at a place
>
> >>> where we can implement this. If I'm wrong, and someone in the community
>
> >>> wants to step up and take this responsibility, I think it would really
>
> >>> benefit our users.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> What do other's think?
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Cheers,
>
> >>> Jason
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:24 AM Pierre-Yves Péneau <
>
> >>> pierre-yves.pen...@lirmm.fr<mailto:pierre-yves.pen...@lirmm.fr>>
> wrote:
>
> >>>
>
> >>>> Hi all,
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> Since September 2015, gem5 has no stable version. However, a high
>
> >>>> activity has been observed this year, and a lot of major features
>
> >>>> have been added (big.LITTLE support, power modeling, new GPUs,
>
> >>>> ElasticTraces etc..). I am wondering if there is any plan to release
>
> >>>> a new stable version in the next weeks/months ?
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> Thank you.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> --
>
> >>>> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> >>>> | Pierre-Yves Péneau - PhD student |  first.last at lirmm.fr  |
>
> >>>> | LIRMM / CNRS - SYSMIC team       |    + 33 4 67 41 86 33
> <+33%204%2067%2041%2086%2033>
>
> >> <+33%204%2067%2041%2086%2033>    |
>
> >>>> | Building 4 Office H2.2           |    http://walafc0.org    |
>
> >>>> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
>
> >>>> gem5-dev mailing list
>
> >>>> gem5-dev@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-dev@gem5.org>
>
> >>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
> >>>>
>
> >>> _______________________________________________
>
> >>> gem5-dev mailing list
>
> >>> gem5-dev@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-dev@gem5.org>
>
> >>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
> >>
>
> >> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
>
> >> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>
> >> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
>
> >> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
> the
>
> >> information in any medium. Thank you.
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> gem5-dev mailing list
>
> >> gem5-dev@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-dev@gem5.org>
>
> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> gem5-dev mailing list
>
> >> gem5-dev@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-dev@gem5.org>
>
> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
> >>
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> gem5-dev mailing list
>
> >> gem5-dev@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-dev@gem5.org>
>
> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
> >>
>
> >> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
>
> >> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>
> >> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
>
> >> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
> the
>
> >> information in any medium. Thank you.
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> gem5-dev mailing list
>
> >> gem5-dev@gem5.org
>
> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
> >>
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > gem5-dev mailing list
>
> > gem5-dev@gem5.org
>
> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> | Pierre-Yves Péneau - PhD student |  first.last at lirmm.fr  |
>
> | LIRMM / CNRS - SYSMIC team       |    + 33 4 67 41 86 33
> <+33%204%2067%2041%2086%2033>    |
>
> | Building 4 Office H2.2           |    http://walafc0.org    |
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> gem5-dev mailing list
>
> gem5-dev@gem5.org
>
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to