Hi Paul, I think it’s a good idea, we just ping each other once we start doing something.
Regards Matthias > Am 17.08.2017 um 16:09 schrieb Paul Rosenfeld (prosenfeld) > <[email protected]>: > > Hi Matthias, > > It seems like every time I settle in to try to do something on gem5, 15 other > higher priority projects crop up. Although I very much want to work on this, > it appears that the earliest I may have time is October. > > Could you ping me if you (or anyone else out there in gem5 land) start > working on this? I will do the same if I start working on it but I don't want > to accidentally duplicate effort. > > Regards, > Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: gem5-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthias Jung > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 5:31 AM > To: gem5 Developer List <[email protected]> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [gem5-dev] Merging the TLM/SystemC examples? > > Hi Paul, > > I have it on my todo list to bring the complete functionality to util/systemc > to util/tlm because I also need checkpoints. If everything is ported we could > probably remove util/systemc probably. If you port the features over to TLM > you can select me as a reviewer. If you need any help or assistance please > let me know ;) > > Regards > Matthias > > >> Am 06.07.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Paul Rosenfeld (prosenfeld) >> <[email protected]>: >> >> Hello all, >> >> I've been looking at the SystemC example (util/systemc) and the TLM examples >> (util/tlm) and trying to figure out if both examples are actually needed. As >> far as I can tell, the TLM example is basically a more well-structured and >> recently updated clone of the SystemC example. However, the SystemC example >> has some extra features that the TLM example doesn't such as the ability to >> create/restore checkpoints, set parameters, and switch CPUs. So the question >> I have is: if I were to port the SystemC example's extra features over to >> the TLM example, would the SystemC example still be needed or are they >> attempting to show different things that I'm just not seeing? >> >> Regards, >> Paul >> _______________________________________________ >> gem5-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
