Ping...

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:38 PM Gabe Black <gabebl...@google.com> wrote:

> Hi Jason. I just read TESTING.md, and while it gives at least an
> introduction into running the tests, it doesn't say anything I could see
> about adding new tests. Where can I find documentation for that?
>
> Gabe
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:23 PM Gabe Black <gabebl...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> No problem, I understand how hard it can be to keep all the plates
>> spinning when things get really busy. I'll take a look at TESTING.md
>> (again? I think I may have read it once upon a time.) and let you know if I
>> get stuck. I was thinking of doing/helping do exactly what you're
>> describing, ie. get more tests like the systemc tests hooked up, porting
>> over old tests, and getting it all to run automatically.
>>
>> Gabe
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Jason Lowe-Power <ja...@lowepower.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Gabe,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the slow response. I've been hoping to make more progress on
>>> the testing framework, but as always, it's been put on the back burner.
>>>
>>> The current state is that things should be all working. The best thing
>>> you could help with is adding new tests (e.g., for systemc) and porting old
>>> tests over to find the missing features, missing documentation, etc. I have
>>> some patches that are very close to being ready for memory tests (e.g.,
>>> traffic gen) and CPU tests, but I'm working with some students to get them
>>> pushed and it's taking longer than I hoped. Hopefully, this will happen in
>>> the next couple of weeks.
>>>
>>> Related, I think the jenkins/kokoro integration is very close as well. I
>>> was working on it last month, and I remember everything mostly working. I
>>> think it just needed some more testing (preferably with more tests). I'll
>>> have some time the week of the 14th to look into this more.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you have any specific questions on how to add tests to
>>> the new testing framework. I tried to write good documentation in
>>> TESTING.md, but it may be missing things. I'll be more responsive next time
>>> :).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:30 PM Gabe Black <gabebl...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello...?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 3:26 PM Gabe Black <gabebl...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> These changes have all been checked in. I still need some info about
>>>>> how to hook them systemc tests into Jason and co's framework.
>>>>>
>>>>> In general, how is getting that framework installed and ready to use
>>>>> coming along? Is there any blocking issue I can help with?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gabe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 7:16 PM Gabe Black <gabebl...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks, and specifically Jason.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With these pending changes, the systemc tests (with the checked in
>>>>>> filter applied) should all pass, and should be well behaved and not leave
>>>>>> random files scattered around the source tree when run. Three of these
>>>>>> changes fix some small bugs I found while finishing this out, and two
>>>>>> update reference test output to match gem5's legal but slightly different
>>>>>> behavior compared to Accellera.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/14915
>>>>>> https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/14916
>>>>>> https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/14917
>>>>>> https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/14918
>>>>>> https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/14919
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The next step will be to integrate these tests into the overarching
>>>>>> test framework Jason and co. have been working on. I'm pretty sure 
>>>>>> there's
>>>>>> documentation out there which should tell me how to do this, but to save 
>>>>>> me
>>>>>> some minor effort could someone point out what I should read to see how 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> do this? Any other tips or suggestions to keep in mind?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gabe
>>>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to