Hey Gabe, That change is still in review: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/53503
I just wanted to get a few more eyes on it before submitting. You are correct, after this is merged we'll no longer need to compile X86_MESI_Two_Level and vanilla X86. Kind regards, Bobby -- Dr. Bobby R. Bruce Room 3050, Kemper Hall, UC Davis Davis, CA, 95616 web: https://www.bobbybruce.net On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:42 AM Gabe Black <[email protected]> wrote: > And also GCN3_X86, which hadn't started yet. > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:27 AM Gabe Black <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Bobby and other folks. While I'm waiting for reviews on my register >> related multiISA patch series, I'm running long regressions on it to try to >> preemptively track down any bugs that might be in it. >> >> I notice that the test framework is build both >> build/X86_MESI_Two_Level/gem5.opt and build/X86/gem5.opt. I think I >> remember Bobby changing the ruby protocol of X86 to default to >> MESI_Two_Level (or similar? Not yet checked in?), so having both versions >> of X86 seem particularly redundant. >> >> I think this is less of a problem for the long regressions, but it would >> still be nice/more efficient to get rid of the redundancy. >> >> Gabe >> >
_______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
