Ok, great, thanks! On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 11:20 AM Bobby Bruce <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Gabe, > > That change is still in review: > https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/53503 > > I just wanted to get a few more eyes on it before submitting. You are > correct, after this is merged we'll no longer need to compile > X86_MESI_Two_Level and vanilla X86. > > Kind regards, > Bobby > -- > Dr. Bobby R. Bruce > Room 3050, > Kemper Hall, UC Davis > Davis, > CA, 95616 > > web: https://www.bobbybruce.net > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:42 AM Gabe Black <[email protected]> wrote: > >> And also GCN3_X86, which hadn't started yet. >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:27 AM Gabe Black <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Bobby and other folks. While I'm waiting for reviews on my register >>> related multiISA patch series, I'm running long regressions on it to try to >>> preemptively track down any bugs that might be in it. >>> >>> I notice that the test framework is build both >>> build/X86_MESI_Two_Level/gem5.opt and build/X86/gem5.opt. I think I >>> remember Bobby changing the ruby protocol of X86 to default to >>> MESI_Two_Level (or similar? Not yet checked in?), so having both versions >>> of X86 seem particularly redundant. >>> >>> I think this is less of a problem for the long regressions, but it would >>> still be nice/more efficient to get rid of the redundancy. >>> >>> Gabe >>> >>
_______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
