That makes sense to me. I can do that at some point or if you'd rather
that'd be fine too.

Gabe

nathan binkert wrote:
>>> It won't, but if you use the attached patch it seems to. Let me know if
>>> it looks good and I'll tack it onto my queue.
>> Patch looks good.
> 
> Actually, does it make sense to get rid of cxx_namespace and just make
> it part of cxx_type?  If you're going to do a split anyway, why bother
> to have two variables.
> 
>   Nate
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to