Whoever gets to it.   If you don't want to do it instead of the simple
patch you wrote, we can put it on the todo list.  In general, that
code is getting pretty messy and needs some TLC.

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Gabe Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That makes sense to me. I can do that at some point or if you'd rather
> that'd be fine too.
>
> Gabe
>
> nathan binkert wrote:
>>>> It won't, but if you use the attached patch it seems to. Let me know if
>>>> it looks good and I'll tack it onto my queue.
>>> Patch looks good.
>>
>> Actually, does it make sense to get rid of cxx_namespace and just make
>> it part of cxx_type?  If you're going to do a split anyway, why bother
>> to have two variables.
>>
>>   Nate
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-dev mailing list
>> m5-dev@m5sim.org
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to