Do you want to hold off on letting a stable out for this stuff? I'd say that we need to get stable done to allow things into the tree, and we can try to make this a part of the next stable release which we can target as 2.0.
Nate > I think high on the list needs to be a clean-up of the statistics in > models. Some are fine, most exist but their precise meaning (mostly in > the CPU and cache models) isn't clear, a few might be wrong, and some > don't exist, but they need to (bus and bridge). > > I don't the the statistics are presently any worse than they are in > stable, however I do think we should spend some time working on them > in the near term and call that 2.0. I'll volunteer to take care of the > bus and the bridge. > > Ali > > > > > On Sep 26, 2008, at 16:41, "nathan binkert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ok, now that kevin has fixed the O3 problems that we've had, what's >> left? >> >> 1) I've got a couple more outstanding changes that get GCC 4.3 fully >> functional >> 2) I'd like to update all regressions so there are no differences. >> >> Anything else? Someone else willing to do the leg work to announce >> everything? >> >> Nate >> _______________________________________________ >> m5-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
