Maybe we should start by going through flyspray and determining what
issues still exist and which need to be closed.  It would be nice to
get a 2.0 release done, but it seems hard to say that we could do that
in 2 or 3 days.  I could put some serious effort into it after ISCA is
over and try to really get something going by sometime in January.

Any other opinions?

  Nate

> I could go either way. If it forced us to just get it done in 2 or 3
> days then it would be worth it. Otherwise, we should push it off, but
> not too far.
> Ali
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2008, at 11:51 PM, nathan binkert wrote:
>
>> Do you want to hold off on letting a stable out for this stuff?  I'd
>> say that we need to get stable done to allow things into the tree, and
>> we can try to make this a part of the next stable release which we can
>> target as 2.0.
>>
>>  Nate
>>
>>> I think high on the list needs to be a clean-up of the statistics in
>>> models. Some are fine, most exist but their precise meaning (mostly
>>> in
>>> the CPU and cache models) isn't clear, a few might be wrong, and some
>>> don't exist, but they need to (bus and bridge).
>>>
>>> I don't the the statistics are presently any worse than they are in
>>> stable, however I do think we should spend some time working on them
>>> in the near term and call that 2.0. I'll volunteer to take care of
>>> the
>>> bus and the bridge.
>>>
>>> Ali
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 26, 2008, at 16:41, "nathan binkert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, now that kevin has fixed the O3 problems that we've had, what's
>>>> left?
>>>>
>>>> 1) I've got a couple more outstanding changes that get GCC 4.3 fully
>>>> functional
>>>> 2) I'd like to update all regressions so there are no differences.
>>>>
>>>> Anything else?  Someone else willing to do the leg work to announce
>>>> everything?
>>>>
>>>> Nate
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> m5-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> m5-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to