>
> > I'd probably lean towards Ali's proposal due to its simplicity, but I
> > think we'd need to run ispell on all of the messages to make sure that
> > they're ok and I think we also need to find out how many duplicates we
> > have because the same message is in multiple places.
> Yes. I don't think we have many duplicates, at least not when the the
> messages are meaningful. panic("crap") isn't at all helpful.
And conversely if panic("Useful error message") shows up in more than one place,
it would ideally have the same explanation on the same wiki page. People would
need to try to be consistent with each other as far as the exact text goes
though.
One thing we should consider is the fact that not everyone will be using the
same version of the source. If a message changes and we move the page, the old
message could still be out there but have no explanation. If old wiki pages
live forever that may start to get crowded.
Gabe
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev