> Yes and yes. All the bugs I fixed last night I found with a massaged
> version of the main test program from there and more will be coming. I'm
> definitely planning on using it as a regression in SE, and also as the
> program to run in FS once the kernel is booted because it can use some
> syscalls we don't support in SE. I want to wait until things aren't
> changing so much, aka until the output matches and more of the phases of
> the test run, before making it into a regression.

This sounds great.  Are you basically just implementing missing
instructions right now?

  Nate
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to