On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Gabe Black wrote: > Looking through my email, I found this patch which I don't think ever > got committed. Do you know of any others like this, Vince? I found this > one specifically because I'm getting ready to commit my changes that > cleans up the ext flags, and this would need to be adjusted slightly.
This is the only outstanding SSE fix that I have. You had suggested a few improvements and I was a bit busy with other things. > The change is relatively minor, so you can go ahead and commit this and > I'll fix it up in my change, or you can wait and I can describe what > you'd need to do. You can go ahead with your changes and I can fix it up afterward. I do plan to try to get the rest of my patches merged, but it might be a few weeks before I get a chance. I did finish running and verifying spec2k on x86_64 (it took longer than it should have due to an unfortunate power-outage on our cluster). The benchmarks all finished, and the retired instruction count matches actual hardware perf counters very closely. http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~vince/projects/m5/m5_x86_64_se_status.html Vince _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
