Vince Weaver wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Gabe Black wrote: > > >> Looking through my email, I found this patch which I don't think ever >> got committed. Do you know of any others like this, Vince? I found this >> one specifically because I'm getting ready to commit my changes that >> cleans up the ext flags, and this would need to be adjusted slightly. >> > > This is the only outstanding SSE fix that I have. You had suggested a few > improvements and I was a bit busy with other things. >
No problem, me too. > >> The change is relatively minor, so you can go ahead and commit this and >> I'll fix it up in my change, or you can wait and I can describe what >> you'd need to do. >> > > You can go ahead with your changes and I can fix it up afterward. > > I do plan to try to get the rest of my patches merged, but it might be a > few weeks before I get a chance. > > I did finish running and verifying spec2k on x86_64 (it took longer than > it should have due to an unfortunate power-outage on our cluster). The > benchmarks all finished, and the retired instruction count matches actual > hardware perf counters very closely. > > http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~vince/projects/m5/m5_x86_64_se_status.html > That's great news! Thanks for this and all your other work. Have a great break, and (figuratively) see you next year! Gabe _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
