> So you were thinking it should be 'int buffer_size(10)'? No. This is what I was getting at about organic growth. I think = is the natural choice given what is there, but if we were to try to start with a fresh language that tried to be C++-like, I'm not sure we would have gotten down this path. That said, I don't use the language and I'm not clear that being C++-like buys that much.
> I thought I was doing well to use '=' and not ':=' :-) := and = have become very confused. Is there a real semantic difference, or is it simply that some syntax uses = while other syntax uses :=. Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
