My comment was more that we might want to re-evaluate the timing simple cpu as it's left the simple bit a while ago. Many of the fault == NoFault checks don't matter with the translation state change since it's always going to return no fault.
I was hoping to get a discussion going about what if anything we should do. Ali On Jun 4, 2010, at 5:29 PM, nathan binkert wrote: >> On a somewhat related note, it seems like the timing simple cpu control >> flow has gotten pretty messy with the addition of the translation state >> code. To figure out what is going on you really need a large white board >> and a lot of time to map out the call tree and what happens on faults and >> the like. > > Ali, > > If it is correct, can you commit the patch? If you're not the right > person, Gabe? > > Nate > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
