> On 2010-07-11 15:25:09, Nathan Binkert wrote:
> > src/sim/syscall_emul.cc, line 190
> > <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/52/diff/1/?file=758#file758line190>
> >
> >     I personally feel that the use of ?: here isn't warranted.  It hides 
> > what this line of code is actually doing.  Much better IMHO to do this even 
> > though it is more verbose:
> >     int status = 0;
> >     if (sim_fd > 2)
> >         status = close(sim_fd);

That's cool.  I am happy to change this.


- Timothy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/52/#review85
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2010-07-09 18:15:33, Timothy Jones wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/52/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-07-09 18:15:33)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Syscall: Don't close the simulator's standard file descriptors.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/sim/syscall_emul.cc 249f174e6f37 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/52/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to