On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Nilay Vaish <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 2010-10-24 21:45:51, Steve Reinhardt wrote: >> > src/mem/SConscript, line 61 >> > <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/277/diff/2/?file=4545#file4545line61> >> > >> > Nate and I agreed that it would be nice not to prefix all of these >> > with "Ruby", though if other people feel this decision needs more >> > discussion that's fine. > > To me it seems that cache modeling is forked into two portions, one under the > cache directory and another under the ruby directory. Therefore, I would > prefer having separate trace flags for these two.
It seems very unlikely that anyone would be using both flavors of memory hierarchy models at the same time, so the ability to trace one and not the other doesn't seem valuable to me. Also, I believe the goal in the long run is to make Ruby "the" GEM5 memory system, at which point all these "Ruby" labels will seem very redundant. Not a huge deal, but I'm curious how others feel. Steve _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
