-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#review707
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/cpu/base.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment961>

    Don't add this blank line arbitrarily here.



src/cpu/base.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment962>

    Why is "static" needed here?



src/cpu/o3/cpu.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment963>

    readMiscRegNoEffect is for functional accesses and shouldn't modify any 
stats like this.



src/cpu/o3/cpu.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment964>

    No stats in NoEffect.



src/cpu/o3/cpu.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment965>

    Why would you increment by two?



src/cpu/o3/cpu.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment966>

    Why?



src/cpu/simple/base.hh
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment967>

    No stats in NoEffect.



src/cpu/simple/base.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment968>

    Why not use idleFraction instead of constant(1.0) - notIdleFraction?



src/cpu/simple/base.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment969>

    Why caps? I see increments and not addition. How about a less jarring "/* 
Power model statistics. */"



src/cpu/simple/base.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/#comment970>

    Don't need caps.


- Gabe


On 2011-01-10 10:48:23, Brad Beckmann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-01-10 10:48:23)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and 
> Nathan Binkert.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> mcpat: Adds McPAT performance counters
> 
> Updated patches from Rick Strong's set that modify performance counters for
> McPAT
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/BaseCPU.py 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/base.cc 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/commit.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/commit_impl.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/cpu.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/cpu.cc 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/iew_impl.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/inst_queue.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/inst_queue_impl.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/rename.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/rename_impl.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/rob.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/o3/rob_impl.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/simple/atomic.cc 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/simple/base.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/simple/base.cc 9f9e10967912 
>   src/cpu/simple/timing.cc 9f9e10967912 
>   src/sim/System.py 9f9e10967912 
>   src/sim/system.hh 9f9e10967912 
>   src/sim/system.cc 9f9e10967912 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/380/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brad
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to