I don't think so. update_refs/UPDATE_REFS is used to replace the expected regression outputs, so that shouldn't have any impact on actually running the regressions. If that's not right somebody please speak up.
Gabe On 02/28/11 18:32, nathan binkert wrote: > Do the regression scripts need to be fixed? > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Ali Saidi <sa...@umich.edu > <mailto:sa...@umich.edu>> wrote: > > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/522/ > > > Ship it! > > Looks fine. Two things though: 1) The documentation on the wiki needs to > be updated along with this change. 2) I would like a separate email sent to > the list saying that update_refs -> UPDATE_REFS. > > > - Ali > > > On February 28th, 2011, 4:54 a.m., Gabe Black wrote: > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve > Reinhardt, and Nathan Binkert. > By Gabe Black. > > /Updated 2011-02-28 04:54:41/ > > > Description > > SCons: Clean up some inconsistent capitalization in scons options. > > > Diffs > > * SConstruct (c6ba129c2764) > * src/mem/protocol/SConsopts (c6ba129c2764) > * tests/SConscript (c6ba129c2764) > > View Diff <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/522/diff/> > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
