Hi Max, They almost certainly failed because you didn't have the proper binaries, disk images, and kernels to run the tests. To minimize the repository size it only comes with a simple hello world benchmark.
Ali On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:29:50 +0200, Maximilien Breughe <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > After the efforts for compiling M5, which had errors due to bugs in a > version of swig, I wanted to test my build. I used the commands from the > website but (almost) all regression tests failed. I don't understand > what's going wrong. A small part of the output after typing > build/SPARC_SE/tests/debug > is this : > > ***** > build/SPARC_SE/tests/debug/quick/00.hello/sparc/linux/simple-timing > passed. > > Running test in > build/SPARC_SE/tests/debug/quick/02.insttest/sparc/linux/o3-timing. > build/SPARC_SE/m5.debug -d > build/SPARC_SE/tests/debug/quick/02.insttest/sparc/linux/o3-timing -re > tests/run.py > build/SPARC_SE/tests/debug/quick/02.insttest/sparc/linux/o3-timing > M5 exited with non-zero status 1 > ***** build/SPARC_SE/tests/debug/quick/02.insttest/sparc/linux/o3-timing > FAILED! > > Only 00.hello worked. > > I'm using Scientific linux SL release 5.3 and the tools on my computer > are (only the version of swig changed): > > gcc: gcc-c++.x86_64 version 4.1.2-44.el5 > > python: python.x86_64 version 2.4.3-24.el5_3.6 > > SCons: scons version 1.2.0.d20090919 > > swig: swig.x86_64 version 1.3.40 > > zlib: > zlib.i386 version 1.2.3-3 and > zlib.x86_64 version 1.2.3-3 > > m4: m4.x86_64 version 1.4.5-3.el5.1 > > > Anyone who can help me out? > > > Max > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
