John, Can you please clarify which document/version this review applies to (i.e, mimetype-00 or mediatype-01)?
Thanks, Mary -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 5:12 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-kosonen-mobile-xmf-mimetype-01.txt I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-kosonen-mobile-xmf-mediatype-01.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. I would suggest that a DISCUSS be issued on the document, based upon the four points below. These should be relatively easy to fix, though. 1) The abstract has references and some abbreivatiations, for example XMF. I would suggest to rewrite the abstract without the references, and expand XMF, so that readers unfamiliar with the details would at least understand (at a high-level) what the document is trying to do. 2) IANA Considerations section should explicitly state the MIME subtype details, and information into which registry it should be placed. 3) Security considerations section - would general MIME threats be applicable for this document? 4) What is meant by the "Change controller:" section? thanks, John _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
