I apparently forgot to reply back in March. Sorry. Spencer Dawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I was thinking about this from the client's perspective (if the collation > doesn't report "error", how does the client know to report anything to > someone who might be able to fix the input?).
There's no point in doing that. Take my home, IMAP. If an IMAP client tells the server to sort the messages by subject, and one message's subject contains an illegal ISO-2022-JP sequence, the collation will return "error" a few times. That's not a bug in the client or server, it's just another broken mail message. Usually it's spam. Routine. > No, I'm sorry that I wasn't clearer. I was trying to say that if the > designated expert fumbles the evaluation, perhaps talking to an APPS-area > AD would be sufficient to resolve most appeals, without involving the rest > of the IESG, unless the APPS-area AD fumbles the first-level appeal. I made this change. Arnt _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
