At 10:26 AM -0500 10/16/09, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: >Note that I am not sure what the intended status of this >document is (hence the "UNKNOWN" above.) The draft itself appears >to think it is headed for "Standards Track", but the IETF Tracker >appears to think otherwise -- it thinks that the intended >status is "Informational" (please see >https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings/).
I'm not sure where you see "UNKNOWN": when I look at that URL on the data tracker, it says it is intended as an Informational RFC, which is what the WG agreed to. >Major issues: 0. >Minor issues: 0. >Nits/editorial comments: 0. Whee! --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
