At 11:17 AM -0500 10/16/09, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: >Paul Hoffman wrote: >>I'm not sure where you see "UNKNOWN": when I look at that URL on the >>data tracker, it says it is intended as an Informational RFC, which >>is what the WG agreed to. > >Paul: *I* put in "UNKNOWN" in my Gen-ART review because I was >not sure what the intended status is -- Informational or >Standards Track. The draft itself seems to think it should >be Standards Track (the "Intended status" line at the >top of the draft), but the IETF Tracker thinks it is >Informational.
Ah, right. That was pilot error on *my* part, given that I turned in the last draft. Apologies. >If the WG agreed to this being an Informational document, >the the fix is simple: just change the "Intended status" >line in the draft itself to match. Will do, thanks. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
