Paul Hoffman wrote:
I'm not sure where you see "UNKNOWN": when I look at that URL on the
data tracker, it says it is intended as an Informational RFC, which
is what the WG agreed to.
Paul: *I* put in "UNKNOWN" in my Gen-ART review because I was
not sure what the intended status is -- Informational or
Standards Track. The draft itself seems to think it should
be Standards Track (the "Intended status" line at the
top of the draft), but the IETF Tracker thinks it is
Informational.
If the WG agreed to this being an Informational document,
the the fix is simple: just change the "Intended status"
line in the draft itself to match.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
