Hi, Vijay, On 03/01/2011 07:03 p.m., Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
>>> 6) S3.7 --- when discussing the Fragment Offset, is it worth >>> stating that the Fragment Offset is measured in units of 8 octets >>> (thereby giving the magic number 65528 = 8191*8)? >> >> This *is* mentioned in the first paragraph of Section 3.7, as follows: >> >> ---- cut here ---- >> It indicates where in the original datagram payload >> the payload of the fragment belongs, and is measured in units of >> eight bytes. >> ---- cut here ---- >> >> So I assume no changes needed here? > > Well, following the principle of being explicit with magic numbers > dictates that 65528 be explained. Something like the following may > help in being more explicit: > > s/an offset 65528 bytes/an offset 65528 (8191*8) bytes/ Sounds reasonable. Will do. > Thanks for entertaining my rather late review. Thanks *you* for your feedback! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: [email protected] || [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
