Was there a resolution to this issue? Should we update the title to say
"Implementation guideline and clarification of sender behavior in
persist condition"?
On 6/5/2011 8:39 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
It would be a lot clearer to a new reader if the title indicated
that it's an implementation guideline - I certainly started reading
on the assumption that it was a protocol update, which as you say,
it isn't.
I'm sure the IESG will come back with a proposed resolution.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
