That would be OK for me. Actually you could usefully make it "Implementation guideline and clarification of sender behavior in TCP persist condition".
In any case it's for the document shepherd to advise you what to do next. Regards Brian Carpenter On 2011-07-10 09:51, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > Was there a resolution to this issue? Should we update the title to say > "Implementation guideline and clarification of sender behavior in > persist condition"? > > On 6/5/2011 8:39 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> It would be a lot clearer to a new reader if the title indicated >> that it's an implementation guideline - I certainly started reading >> on the assumption that it was a protocol update, which as you say, >> it isn't. >> >> I'm sure the IESG will come back with a proposed resolution. > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
