Thanks for the review, Meral.  Answers inline.

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Meral Shirazipour <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .****
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
> may receive.****
>
> ** **
>
> Document: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09****
>
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour****
>
> Review Date: 2013-08-29****
>
> IETF LC End Date:  2013-08-29****
>
> IESG Telechat date: 2013-09-12****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Summary:****
>
> This draft is almost ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I
> have some comments.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Nits/editorial comments:****
>
> Nits:****
>
> -[Page 4], line 2, "attributies" --typo-->"attributes"****
>
> -[Page 4], line 8, "support support" ----> remove duplicate****
>
> -[Page 4], line 5 before last, "is cable of" ----->"is capable of"****
>
> -[Page 4], line 4 before last, "until finds" ----->"until it finds"****
>
> -[Page 5], Section 3.3, line 2, "[URI-TEMPLATE].  (See Section 3.2.)  ",
> misplaced dot after the reference.****
>
> -[Page 6], line 2, "An media" --typo-->"A media"
>

All fixed.


> ****
>
> ** **
>
> comments:****
>
> -Not sure if it was forgotten or by choice: second author's affiliation is
> missing.
>

This was intentional.


> ****
>
> -Suggestion: for references to RFCs, it is better to use the [RFC####] as
> reference in the text instead of ["name"].
>

This seems to be a stylistic choice; all of mine so far have used names.


> ****
>
> -Section 4, please double check to make sure RFC5226 is followed.
>

Is there something in particular that was missed?  There's only a single
action here, and it's pretty simple at that.


> ****
>
> -Appendix B, not sure if necessary since it is the WGs list and not some
> other mailing list.
>

I've tagged it for the RFC Editor to remove it prior to publication.

Thanks again,

-MSK
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to