Hi,
   Thank you for the clarifications. I have no more comments.

Best Regards,
Meral

From: Murray S. Kucherawy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:34 AM
To: Meral Shirazipour
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09

Thanks for the review, Meral.  Answers inline.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Meral Shirazipour 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2013-08-29
IETF LC End Date:  2013-08-29
IESG Telechat date: 2013-09-12


Summary:
This draft is almost ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have 
some comments.


Nits/editorial comments:
Nits:
-[Page 4], line 2, "attributies" --typo-->"attributes"
-[Page 4], line 8, "support support" ----> remove duplicate
-[Page 4], line 5 before last, "is cable of" ----->"is capable of"
-[Page 4], line 4 before last, "until finds" ----->"until it finds"
-[Page 5], Section 3.3, line 2, "[URI-TEMPLATE].  (See Section 3.2.)  ",  
misplaced dot after the reference.
-[Page 6], line 2, "An media" --typo-->"A media"

All fixed.


comments:
-Not sure if it was forgotten or by choice: second author's affiliation is 
missing.

This was intentional.

-Suggestion: for references to RFCs, it is better to use the [RFC####] as 
reference in the text instead of ["name"].

This seems to be a stylistic choice; all of mine so far have used names.

-Section 4, please double check to make sure RFC5226 is followed.

Is there something in particular that was missed?  There's only a single action 
here, and it's pretty simple at that.

-Appendix B, not sure if necessary since it is the WGs list and not some other 
mailing list.

I've tagged it for the RFC Editor to remove it prior to publication.
Thanks again,
-MSK
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to