Alexey, The review comments have been implemented and are visible in the github in-progress version: https://github.com/jounikor/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis/blob/master/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-04.txt
- Jouni On Aug 30, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may > receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-03 > Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov > Review Date: 30 August 2013 > IETF LC End Date: 2 September 2013 > IESG Telechat date: 12 September 2013 > > Summary: Ready with nits. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits: > > In 1.1 > > This document complements the IPv6 node requirements [RFC6434] in > places where clarifications are needed the with discussion on the use > > Delete "the" before "with"? > > of these selected IPv6 specifications when operating over a cellular > interface. > > In 2.2: > > RTP and SIP need Informative references. > > In 2.4: > > PPP needs an Informative reference. > > Also, where is IPv6CP defined? > > > Appendix B. Changes to RFC 3316 > > I think that before publication this section needs to be reworked a bit to > have a single list of changes, referencing particular draft versions is not > going to be very useful in the final RFC. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
