Hi,
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>
>>> Since you are providing an extension point for other values, someone
>>> will ask if you need a registry for those values. I suggest
>>> explicitly saying we are not creating a registry at this time but
>>> expect to do so if the extension point is ever used to head that
>>> conversation off.
>> I could add the following text to the Syntax/General section:
>>
>> "This specification does not create an IANA registry for 'iotl'
>> parameter values.
>> If new parameters values are defined in the future, such registry needs
>> to be
>> created."
>>
>> Or, do you think it should be somewhere else?
> It's fine there. However, I would change the last sentence to "A registry
> should be considered if new parameter values are defined in the future".
Ok.
"This specification does not create an IANA registry for 'iotl'
parameter values.
A registry should be considered if new parameter values are defined in
the future"
---------------
>>> The sentence (which occurs in the abstract and introduction) "The
>>> directionality in traffic legs relates to a SIP request creating a
>>> dialogue and stand-alone SIP request." does not parse. What is it
>>> trying to say, and why is it important?
>> The sentence is not needed (and it doesn't belong in the Abstract to begin
>> with), so I suggest to remove it.
> You'll remove it from the introduction as well?
Yes.
Regards,
Christer
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
