Hi Robert,

Are you ok with the suggested changes?

I suggest that we don't change the 3GPP scope. It would delay the draft, and 
nobody has shown any interest for non-3GPP usage.

Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: Gen-art [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
Sent: 19. joulukuuta 2014 16:10
To: Robert Sparks; General Area Review Team
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-art LC review: 
draft-holmerg-dispatch-iotl-03.txt

Hi,

>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>
>>> Since you are providing an extension point for other values, someone 
>>> will ask if you need a registry for those values. I suggest 
>>> explicitly saying we are not creating a registry at this time but 
>>> expect to do so if the extension point is ever used to head that 
>>> conversation off.
>> I could add the following text to the Syntax/General section:
>>
>>      "This specification does not create an IANA registry for 'iotl' 
>> parameter values.
>>      If new parameters values are defined in the future, such registry needs 
>> to be
>>      created."
>>
>> Or, do you think it should be somewhere else?
> It's fine there. However, I would change the last sentence to "A registry 
> should be considered if new parameter values are defined in the future".

Ok.

        "This specification does not create an IANA registry for 'iotl' 
parameter values.
        A registry should be considered if new parameter values are defined in 
the future"

---------------

>>> The sentence (which occurs in the abstract and introduction) "The 
>>> directionality in traffic legs relates to a SIP request creating a 
>>> dialogue and stand-alone SIP request." does not parse. What is it 
>>> trying to say, and why is it important?
>> The sentence is not needed (and it doesn't belong in the Abstract to begin 
>> with), so I suggest to remove it.
> You'll remove it from the introduction as well?

Yes.

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to