Hi Tom, Thanks for reading the draft and the feedback.
> On 25 Dec 2014, at 15:46, Tom Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Replies with [PTT] below. > > On 25/12/2014 3:21 AM, Huangyihong (Rachel) wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> Thank you for the nice Gen-ART review. Please see my replies inline starting >> with "[Rachel]". >> >> BR, >> Rachel >>> >>> Minor issues: >>> >>> 1) Second paragraph of Introduction: last sentence introduces the "repaired >>> loss count". I found this confusing. Figure 1 shows you really meant >>> "unrepaired >>> loss count". >> >> [Rachel]: This report block introduces two metrics : "unrepaired loss count" >> which is specified as the total number of packets finally lost after >> applying loss-repair methods. And "repaired loss count" is specified as the >> total number of packets which are fully repaired after applying loss-repair >> methods. And in this sentence, I meant "repaired loss count" because this >> metric is used to help calculating pre-repair loss count (pre-repair loss >> count = unrepaired loss count + repaired loss count). Maybe the name of >> "unrepaired loss count" is confusing. Would it better changing to >> "post-repair loss count"? > > [PTT] Yes, "post-repair loss count" sounds good. This is a very good recommendation, we should replace other instances of unrepaired loss with post-repaired, as well. Including in the block format. --- http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
