Hi, I have not heard from the authors. My 2nd and 3rd comments on [page 3] would need more attention.
Best , Meral > -----Original Message----- > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:38 AM > To: Meral Shirazipour > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-json-i-json-05 > > Thanks for your review, Meral. > > Have you authors observed the comments and taken all actions that you > think are necessary? > > FWIW, I have placed the following position on the ballot for tonight's IESG > call: > > No Objection - I should note that there was a Gen-ART review from Meral > with some minor editorial observations. For instance, the first sentence of > Section 3 could use improvement. These could be handled by the RFC Editor, > too. > > jari > > On 14 Jan 2015, at 10:00, Meral Shirazipour > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen- > ART, please see the FAQ at > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. > > > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-json-i-json-05 > > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > > Review Date: 2015-01-14 > > IETF LC End Date: 2015-01-14 > > IESG Telechat date: NA > > > > > > Summary: > > This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some > comments . > > > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > -Please spell out acronyms at first use. E.g. JSON, I-JSON > > > > -[Page 3], "treat an integer", it would be good to mention this is still > referring to IEEE754 format. > > > > -[Page 3],"(one example would be 64-bit integers)", here not clear if still > IEEE7544 is discussed or integer format. If latter, is it signed/unsigned. > > "RECOMMENDED to encode them in JSON string values." should this be > done in decimal format then? > > > > -[Page 4], Section 3, "in the JSON messages it receives."--->"in the JSON > messages they receives." > > > > -[Page 4], "receiving implementation"---->"receiving implementations" > > > > Best Regards, > > Meral > > --- > > Meral Shirazipour > > Ericsson > > Research > > www.ericsson.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Gen-art mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
