> Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments Either spelling is correct (also true of judg[e]ment).
grep will tell you that more RFCs use acknowledgement than acknowledgment, and more use judgment than judgement. Regards Brian On 05/03/2015 04:56, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-stox-im-12.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20150226 > IETF LC End Date: 20150302 > IESG Telechat date: 20150305 > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - ToC page 2 and Appendix A page 11: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - 1 page 2: even its meaning is obvious the abbrev IM is never > introduced. > > - 1 page 3: the word groupchat does not belong formerly to the > English language... > > - 4 page 5 (twice): acknowledgements -> acknowledgments > > - 8 page 8: signalling -> signaling > > - 11.2 page 10: the first informative reference is for a 2012 I-D. > > Regards > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > . > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
