Hi John,
On 11/06/2015 13:51, John Bradley wrote:
I believe that the other comments were all-ready addressed in draft 12 as a
result of Ben Laurie’s comments from last week.
If Alexey can double check that I got everything that would be great. I
re-worked those sections to capture Ben’s comments.
My comment on 7.1/7.3 is addressed.
Can you elaborate a bit on why code_challenge_method is not needed in 4.5?
John B.
On Jun 11, 2015, at 3:00 AM, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks for your review, Alexey. I have followed the discussion about
plain with interest, but will leave holding the discuss to Barry.
John, it was not clear to me if you had done everything you needed to with
respect to Alexey’s other comments (reproduced below). Have you?
Minor Concerns:
Is code_challenge_method missing in 4.5?
Sections 7.1 and 7.3 are talking about the same thing? Should they be merged
into one? If they are not talking about the same thing, should they be named
differently?
Jari
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
