Thanks, John & Alexey! Jari
On 11 Jun 2015, at 15:57, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > On 11/06/2015 13:51, John Bradley wrote: >> I believe that the other comments were all-ready addressed in draft 12 as a >> result of Ben Laurie’s comments from last week. >> >> If Alexey can double check that I got everything that would be great. I >> re-worked those sections to capture Ben’s comments. > My comment on 7.1/7.3 is addressed. > > Can you elaborate a bit on why code_challenge_method is not needed in 4.5? >> John B. >> >>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 3:00 AM, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for your review, Alexey. I have followed the discussion about >>> plain with interest, but will leave holding the discuss to Barry. >>> >>> John, it was not clear to me if you had done everything you needed to with >>> respect to Alexey’s other comments (reproduced below). Have you? >>> >>>> Minor Concerns: >>>> >>>> Is code_challenge_method missing in 4.5? >>>> >>>> Sections 7.1 and 7.3 are talking about the same thing? Should they be >>>> merged into one? If they are not talking about the same thing, should they >>>> be named differently? >>> Jari >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
