- Jouni
Summary:
This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits
that should be fixed before publication. The nits are only
editorial.
Comments:
I do have little expertise on ECRIT topics in general so bear with me.
* The I-D gives IDnits errors and stuff and those must be corrected.
Specifically those that concern the abstract, updating RFCs and such.
* Starting from Section 1 (Intro) most of the acronyms are not expanded
on the first use.. or at all in the document. Revisit all acronyms
including HELD, LoST etc and expand them on the first use.
* The sentence on line 185 (IDnits) took me a while to parse ;) Maybe
some rewording would make it a bit more readable.
* There is no reference to "forest guide". I would expect to see one
and at least a note that it is a special instance of a LoST server.
* In Section 4 URN is written multiple times as "urn".
* On line 290 s/PSAPS/PSAPs
* On lines 304 and 310 s/section/Section
* On line 462 s/Layer 7/layer-7
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document
shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more
information, please see the FAQ at <
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ecrit-held-routi... Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ecrit-h... Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ecrit-h... James Winterbottom
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ecrit-h... James Winterbottom
