> On Feb 7, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Meral Shirazipour > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-bidirection-06 > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review Date: 2017-02-07 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-07 > IESG Telechat date: - > > > Summary: > This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have > comments. > > Major issues: > Minor issues: > Nits/editorial comments: > -General: please consider spelling out acronyms at first use and use the > acronym consistently thereafter.
To address this comment (and Jouni's related LC comment) I've introduced the following forward definitions: - RPC = Remote Procedure Call - RDMA = Remote Direct Memory Access - RPC-over-RDMA - defined by citation - NFS = Network File System - XDR - removed all usage - XID = RPC transaction ID, and capitalized consistently - NULL probe - replaced with "RPC NULL procedure" - ULP - replaced with "RPC Program" - Chunks - defined before use, and added citation Please let me know if there are other unfamiliar terms I've missed, or if there is a particular inconsistent usage that should be corrected. > -[Page 6], "(ie. a "---->"(i.e., a" Fixed. -- Chuck Lever _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
